Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Potts's avatar

I think this is a very valid question; Rune reading had a similar thing back in the 70's, when a chap called Ralph Blum started selling his own book on runes -it was largely made up, but came with a little bag of plastic runes that people bought and really enjoyed it.

The difference there is there wasn't a big existing runes market (or a vast amount of publicly popular or visible academic study) like there is with Tarot, so for a lot of people Blum was their introduction to runes, and he rode the "pop magic" second rise of wicca in the 80's and 90's.

Unfortunately as more serious academic study has gone on, we've learned that a lot of Blum's translations and symbology relating to the staves were simply made up by Blum from whole cloth, and that's the thing to watch out for with any resurgence of esoteric study - the number of people writing on a subject is proportional directly to the amount of bad information!

As long as serious practitioners are able to identify the bad sources from the good ones, and publicly discuss which are bad, which are good, and explain why to any new starters, with luck this will be a good thing for you practitioners of Tarot

Expand full comment
Kmarysmith's avatar

I remember my first "appropriation" in the late 60's when the Summer of Love was monetized. All I can say more than 50 years later is that the authentic endures and the shallow falls away. Some exposed to Tarot silliness today will be inspired to take a deep dive. Others will move on to the next big thing. It's a next gain in the end but not pretty to watch.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?